From boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk  Thu Feb  1 23:48:43 2007
From: boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk (G.)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Box Backup-dev] "setlimit 0 (...) back with vengeance (Was: Proposal (patch): bbstored HousekeepingStyle mod)
Message-ID: <365063.27529.qm@web36703.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

FYI,=0A=0ASince we seem to have reached a consensus on this issue, I fixed =
bbackupd, tested it for a few days on a live repository, and submitted a ti=
cket with the patch to Trac: "Ticket #19: bbackupd artificial block check p=
revents setting low or zero soft-limit".=0A=0AThanks for the input, guys.=
=0A=0AGary=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A______________________________________________=
______________________________________=0AFinding fabulous fares is fun.  =
=0ALet Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight an=
d hotel bargains.=0Ahttp://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

From boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk  Thu Feb  1 23:59:10 2007
From: boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk (Martin Ebourne)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:59:10 +0000
Subject: [Box Backup-dev] "setlimit 0 (...) back with vengeance (Was:
 Proposal (patch): bbstored HousekeepingStyle mod)
In-Reply-To: <365063.27529.qm@web36703.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <365063.27529.qm@web36703.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1170374350.20774.5.camel@avenin.ebourne.me.uk>

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:48 -0800, G. wrote:
> FYI,
> 
> Since we seem to have reached a consensus on this issue, I fixed
> bbackupd, tested it for a few days on a live repository, and submitted
> a ticket with the patch to Trac: "Ticket #19: bbackupd artificial
> block check prevents setting low or zero soft-limit".

Cool, thanks for your help!

Martin.


From boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk  Tue Feb 13 22:56:18 2007
From: boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk (Chris Wilson)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:56:18 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Box Backup-dev] Trac down?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702132254140.30136@top.qwarx.com>

Hi all, especially James the Trac guru:

There seems to be something wrong with our trac at the moment:

[http://bbdev.fluffy.co.uk/trac/]

   Oops?

   Trac detected an internal error:

   If you think this really should work and you can reproduce it, you
   should consider reporting this problem to the Trac team.

   Traceback (most recent call last):

   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/main.py", line
     387, in dispatch_request
     dispatcher.dispatch(req)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/main.py", line
     191, in dispatch
     chosen_handler = self._pre_process_request(req, chosen_handler)

   [...]

   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyPgSQL/PgSQL.py", line
     2718, in __init__
     self.conn._Connection__setupTransaction()
   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyPgSQL/PgSQL.py", line
     2510, in __setupTransaction
     self.conn.query("BEGIN WORK")

   OperationalError: no connection to the server

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
_____ __     _
\  __/ / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson <0000 at qwirx.com> - Cambs UK |
/ (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Perl/SQL/HTML Developer |
\ _/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU-free your mind-and your software |

From boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk  Wed Feb 14 08:34:15 2007
From: boxbackup-dev@fluffy.co.uk (James O'Gorman)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:34:15 +0000
Subject: [Box Backup-dev] Trac down?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702132254140.30136@top.qwarx.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702132254140.30136@top.qwarx.com>
Message-ID: <45D2C987.7000205@netinertia.co.uk>

Hi Chris,

Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all, especially James the Trac guru:
> 
> There seems to be something wrong with our trac at the moment:
> 
> [http://bbdev.fluffy.co.uk/trac/]
[snip trac errors]

Looks OK now. From the errors I suspect you might have tried to use it
in the very brief two-min period when I was applying security patches to
PostgreSQL!

Let me know if you have any more problems though.

James

