[Box Backup] Re: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #126 - 3 msgs
brett
boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Sat, 4 Sep 2004 09:02:24 -0700
That's an interesting point, especially since it wouldn't introduce any
additional load on the backup server, but rather on the client. I think
while it would be nice to have server-replication built in to bbstored,
being able to have multiple copies of bbackupd running definitely
alleviates the immediate need, and is probably better for most
situations since it keeps the 'cost' paired with the 'need'
b
> From: Ben Summers <ben@fluffy.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Re: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #125 - 2 msgs
> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 08:09:59 +0100
> To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> Reply-To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
>
>
> I suppose you could run two copies of bbackupd...
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 4 Sep 2004, at 05:01, brett wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe a better idea would be to add provisions to boxbackup for
>> multihost backups. It's really the only thing i can think of that's
>> missing ;)
>>
>> b
>>