[Box Backup] Re: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #126 - 3 msgs

brett boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Sat, 4 Sep 2004 09:02:24 -0700


That's an interesting point, especially since it wouldn't introduce any 
additional load on the backup server, but rather on the client. I think 
while it would be nice to have server-replication built in to bbstored, 
being able to have multiple copies of bbackupd running definitely 
alleviates the immediate need, and is probably better for most 
situations since it keeps the 'cost' paired with the 'need'

b


> From: Ben Summers <ben@fluffy.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Re: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #125 - 2 msgs
> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 08:09:59 +0100
> To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> Reply-To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
>
>
> I suppose you could run two copies of bbackupd...
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 4 Sep 2004, at 05:01, brett wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe a better idea would be to add provisions to boxbackup for
>> multihost backups. It's really the only thing i can think of that's
>> missing ;)
>>
>> b
>>