[Box Backup] Housekeeping not catching up...
Imran
boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:58:39 -0500
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:47:07 +0100, Ben Summers wrote
> > But basically the client in question has a lot of updates & new files
> > so it
> > fills up and frequently needs cleaning. The other clients have a lot
> > of files
> > too. but not as frequent of updates.
>
> The current implementation of housekeeping does not work for all
> usage patterns. This is one of them which is sub-optimal.
>
> The next version will have a re-written housekeeper which doesn't
> need to scan everything before deleting. The move to reference
> counted objects will make a big difference.
Yeah definitely. can't wait. :)
> A connection will only interrupt the housekeeping for it's own
> account. All others will be unaffected. (you can see this from the
> logs)
Yeah, but if something gets interrupted, it will have to do that account all
over. which creates even more load? I guess this would be solved by having a
much more efficient & faster housekeeping process.
> That is probably going to take a while to clean up.
okalee dokalee. just making sure that its not stuck, and that I shouldn't
reset the backup store or whatever. cool.
And thanks again, Ben! :)
Imran