[Box Backup] Long time since last release....

Mikael Syska boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:56:09 +0200


Yo,

Primary developed for OpenBSD, the system i run. BSD is the way to go :-)

But I will look forward if there will be new developers on the project, 
I would also help, but my experience in programming aint that good yet, 
but maybe it will be in a year or 2.

// ouT
Leo De Geer wrote:

>Don't forget that there are more than Linux servers running boxbackup you
>have allot of BSD brands and they are not running a Linux kernel.
>
>Regards Leo
>____________________________________
>mobil +46705915987
>hem  +464457121
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk [mailto:boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk] On
>Behalf Of Martin Ebourne
>Sent: den 16 augusti 2005 19:26
>To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
>Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Long time since last release....
>
>On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Summers wrote:
>  
>
>>I am considering using a CVS server on Sourceforge, importing the  
>>latest version, and then inviting the contributers to commit their  
>>changes. I'm not sure what to do about style and quality issues though.
>>    
>>
>
>This would be a good start, but I would prefer you used something a bit
>better than CVS. Personally I have imported recent versions of box into
>a local SVN repository and make all my mods in there, from which I
>generate patches. Does sourceforge provide anything other than CVS these
>days? Some of the other free hosting sites do. I don't think it really
>matters which version control system you use, as long as it's recent,
>they're all loads better than CVS.
>
>I'm sure that opening up some kind of repository with committer access
>is the way to go though, that's what open source is all about.
>
>  
>
>>Then if there's enough interest, perhaps the features could be added  
>>as a collaborative effort too?
>>    
>>
>
>Quite possibly. The thing I'd be most interested in writing would be to
>add inotify support since it will be in the mainline Linux kernel soon.
>This would let bbackupd be fed lists of changed files real time from the
>kernel, and avoid the need to do disk scanning (which has sucked for at
>least 20 years now :)).
>
>Cheers,
>
>Martin.
>
>_______________________________________________
>boxbackup mailing list
>boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
>http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
>
>_______________________________________________
>boxbackup mailing list
>boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
>http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
>  
>