[Box Backup] bbackupquery force overwrite?
Doug Poland
boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:58:22 -0600
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:30PM +0000, Ben Summers wrote:
>
> On 3 Mar 2005, at 14:16, Doug Poland wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:44:42PM +0000, Ben Summers wrote:
> >>On 3 Mar 2005, at 13:38, Doug Poland wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>Is it possible to force bbackupquery to overwrite existing files when
> >>>using the get or restore commands? I looked at documentation.txt and
> >>>searched the mail archive but did see this addressed.
> >>
> >>No. The code is designed to avoid losing data, and will not destroy
> >>anything. This is a backup utility!
> >>
> >I can appreciate that. However, bbackupquery is a restore utility.
> >The other side of the backup coin is the ability to efficiently
> >restore data. One would think that an optional switch supplied to
> >the get or restore command to accomplish this. Your thoughts?
>
> I think that it's possible to efficiently restore data with
> bbackupquery. You can restore to a different filename for individual
> files. You can restore to any directory name you want (and move it in
> place when it's done). And if your restore gets interrupted for any
> reason, you can restart a partially completely restore.
>
> What have I missed? I'm not sure what you could possibly want to do
> that isn't covered by the abilities of the utility. (As long as you're
> prepared to use other unix commands to finish the job off afterwards.)
>
> But then, you haven't explained *why* you want to overwrite files, so I
> could be missing the point completely. Context is a useful thing to
> have when answering questions.
>
Please see my next post on using boxbackup as a tools to synchronize
machines.
--
Regards,
Doug