[Box Backup] Portability and public source depot

[Kai]

Ditto here for mirrors if needed. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk [mailto:boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk]
> On Behalf Of scott@lubetech.com.au
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:32 AM
> To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> Subject: RE: [Box Backup] Portability and public source depot
> 
> 
> If you would like some assistance with free hosting etc.
> Let me know and I can provide some bandwidth/Server space.
> 
> Thank you
> Scott McNee
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk [mailto:boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk]
> On
> Behalf Of Ben Summers
> Sent: Friday, 14 October 2005 7:19 AM
> To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Portability and public source depot
> 
> 
> 
> On 13 Oct 2005, at 21:55, Stefan Norlin wrote:
> 
> >> I think we're going to have to go for an SVN repository. Seems to
> >> be  the one which will get most developers working on the project.
> >>
> >
> > Sounds fine.
> >
> > Would have needed to have a Perforce depot hosted we would
> > gladly have helped out with that.
> >
> > We use Perforce extensively ourselves...
> 
> As nice as the merging support would be to the way we plan to run
> things (as one branch per developer, merging in later), there's not
> much point if noone will use it.
> 
> Even if open source projects get free licenses.
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> boxbackup mailing list
> boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> boxbackup mailing list
> boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup