[Box Backup] RE: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #1167 - 1 msg
Andres Fernandez
boxbackup@boxbackup.org
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:24:36 +0100
Hi, I wanna to download the source code for win32, but I cannot to
find this win32 source code.
You can help me?
Thanks everybody
Andres.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: boxbackup-admin@boxbackup.org [mailto:boxbackup-admin@boxbackup.org] En
nombre de boxbackup-request@boxbackup.org
Enviado el: viernes, 16 de enero de 2009 13:00
Para: boxbackup@boxbackup.org
Asunto: boxbackup digest, Vol 1 #1167 - 1 msg
Send boxbackup mailing list submissions to
boxbackup@boxbackup.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
boxbackup-request@boxbackup.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
boxbackup-admin@boxbackup.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of boxbackup digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. "make test" reports error (67348294@cox.net)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:45:31 -0800
To: boxbackup@boxbackup.org
From: 67348294@cox.net
Subject: [Box Backup] "make test" reports error
Reply-To: boxbackup@boxbackup.org
I recently compiled from following source:
boxbackup-0.11rc2.tgz
on system:
Linux version 2.6.9-22.0.2.EL (buildcentos@build-i386) (gcc version 3.4.5
20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2)) #1 Tue Jan 17 06:51:40 CST 2006
All is good until "make test" which returns:
--------
common: PASSED
crypto: PASSED
compress: PASSED
raidfile: PASSED
basicserver: PASSED
backupstore: PASSED
backupstorefix: PASSED
backupstorepatch: PASSED
backupdiff: PASSED
bbackupd: FAILED: 1 tests failed (first at testbbackupd.cpp:1163)
make: *** [release/common/test] Error 1
--------
The error in "test-bbackupd.log" is:
FAILURE: Condition [exp_str == found_str] failed at testbbackupd.cpp(1163)
Expected <Receiving stream, size 425> but found <Receiving stream, size 481>
in <Receiving stream, size 481>
-------
The system appears to function anyway.
Should I ignore this error?
Is there a workaround?
Thanks,
Stefan
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
boxbackup mailing list
boxbackup@boxbackup.org
http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
End of boxbackup Digest