[IWE] The Authoritarians
Ashton Brown
iwe@warhead.org.uk
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:53:12 -0800
A book title by Bob Altemeyer, reviewed in this typ. bitchin column of
Glenn Greenwald -
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/02/20/various_matters/index.html?source=newsletter
(zIWE has missed a veritable sludgesslide of aberrant psych goings-on -
altogether approaching the consistency and viscosity of the river
through Ankh-Morpork. Surely it's best that we keep our densitometers
in calibration..)
Excerpts:
> [...]
>
> For reasons I have detailed many times -- here and here, for instance
> -- the administration's treatment of U.S. citizen Jose Padilla is one
> of the most disgraceful though illustrative events of the last six
> years (and there is a very vigorous competition for that distinction),
> and the more light that is shined on what our country did to Padilla,
> the better.
>
> (3) Bob Altemeyer is a Professor of Psychology at the University of
> Manitoba, and has become one of the world's leading experts on the
> psychological dynamics which fuel authoritarian political movements
> and their followers. John Dean's best-selling book, 'Conservatives
> Without Conscience' (which I reviewed here), relied on substantial
> amounts of Altemeyer's research.
>
> Now, Altemeyer has written his own book, 'The Authoritarians', which
> expounds on that research. He is releasing the book chapter by chapter
> for free online, and the first six chapters can be read here
> <http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/%7Ealtemey/> . I have read the first
> three chapters and highly recommend them. The book provides real
> insight into the political movement which has been ruling our country
> for the last six years -- a movement which has at least as much to do
> with psychological drives as it does public policy and geopolitical
> considerations.
>
> (4) Much press criticisms focuses on the media's malfeasance during
> the Bush Presidency, but as Digby reminds us in a typically insightful
> post, the genesis for many, if not most, of the fundamental media
> defects is located in the Clinton years, and specifically the media's
> uncritical, breathless treatment of all of the contrived scandals
> churned out by the scandal machine that was really the precursor to
> the Bush movement.
>
> [...]
Can't really say, bon appetit.