[IWE] Question for the list

Ashton Brown iwe@warhead.org.uk
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:06:24 -0800

The minority-dialup member sez -
<~ 200K - no sweat.

More than that: doesn't matter if it's "attached" (vs displayed).  Were 
it >1 MB and I really wanted to Get Mail now? 
I'd have to abort; use WebMail to delete the sucker, unread [obv same 
problem if 'viewed' at all - even remotely.]

Possible both-ways solution, where link-to-website seems awful:
Post message.  Describe what's to be in next message whose title says, 
'Attachment-only for post '___'
Crude? guess it depends on how many of these are apt to erupt in a 
month.. flexibility is All.

Ashton, looking to use my bitchin Parker pen with Gold nib and decent 
blue ink; proseless death via .jpgs !

ummm :-

Wade Bowmer wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:17:10 +1000, Peter Whysall  
> <peter.whysall@serco.com> wrote:
>> What's the general feeling about binary attachments on mail to this 
>> list?
>> The reason I ask is that I was going to post my CV (I've acted on the
>> suggestions made on the moribund forum) and I don't want to do that 
>> if  it's
>> going to upset people.
>> Personally, I'm cool with attachments - but then I have a fast pipe 
>> and a
>> big mailbox.
>> The floor be yours, gentlefolk.
> I think the best approach is to put it on a web server and post a URL.
> Wade.
> _______________________________________________
> IWE mailing list
> IWE@warhead.org.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/iwe