[Box Backup] Comments on BoxBackup 0.09b Win32 reliability?
Nick Knight
boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:38:09 -0000
Cool - did this go out in the last version?
Thanks
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk [mailto:boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk]
On Behalf Of Ben Summers
Sent: 31 January 2005 10:57
To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Comments on BoxBackup 0.09b Win32 reliability?
On 29 Jan 2005, at 18:16, Nick Knight wrote:
>
> I am running the windows port on approx. 10 servers and it does appear
> to be stable, we have an issue where after a month or so of running
> (very randomly) box process will consume 99% of CPU for a period of
> time, not sure whether this has been resolved as I have seen some
> comments that this exist in other ports as well.
For the record, this bug was caused by very large directories. If you=20
had more than a few hundred entries, it took a while to think about it.=20
It was fixed by using a different algorithm.
Ben
_______________________________________________
boxbackup mailing list
boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup