[Box Backup] Comments on BoxBackup 0.09b Win32 reliability?

[Ben Summers]

Yes, in 0.09.


On 1 Feb 2005, at 09:38, Nick Knight wrote:

> Cool - did this go out in the last version?
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk 
> [mailto:boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk]
> On Behalf Of Ben Summers
> Sent: 31 January 2005 10:57
> To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [Box Backup] Comments on BoxBackup 0.09b Win32 
> reliability?
>
>
> On 29 Jan 2005, at 18:16, Nick Knight wrote:
>
>>
>> I am running the windows port on approx. 10 servers and it does appear
>> to be stable, we have an issue where after a month or so of running
>> (very randomly) box process will consume 99% of CPU for a period of
>> time, not sure whether this has been resolved as I have seen some
>> comments that this exist in other ports as well.
>
> For the record, this bug was caused by very large directories. If you
> had more than a few hundred entries, it took a while to think about it.
> It was fixed by using a different algorithm.
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> boxbackup mailing list
> boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> boxbackup mailing list
> boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
>