[Box Backup] ExcludeFile command being ignored with Win32 client.
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:02:21 -0700
On 8/14/06 1:41 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Ben has always said that it makes more sense to reinstall the OS and
> restore the data than to back up the whole OS, but I'm not sure
> whether I agree - the fastest recovery from a disaster would be a
> total restore, as far as I can tell.
Not to rehash old discussions, but the problem with trying to restore
full systems, is that in order to restore a complete system, you need to
have a system from which to restore; a chicken-and-egg thing; you can't
restore a system with Box, unless you have Box installed... There would
be a lot of work involved in getting Box to work like that. It's not
what it's designed for.
If you want to restore a system, you should have two things:
1. A way to restore the system (OS, etc.). There are many packages
out there for this (ghosting for Win, Kick-start for Linux, and
many others I'm sure). They do a great job restoring the OS to a
2. A way to restore the data on the system. This is where Box shines.
It keeps data up-to-date, and makes it easy to restore.
Philosophically, the Unix adage of 'do one thing and do it well' works
well for me. It's hard to make Box a strong multi-platform
system-restore product, while also keeping the data backup features
Per Reedtz Thomsen | Reedtz Consulting, LLC | F: 209 883 4119
V: 209 883 4102 | firstname.lastname@example.org | C: 209 996 9561
GPG ID: 1209784F | Yahoo! Chat: pthomsen | AIM: pthomsen