[Box Backup] Release Candidate 3

[Chris Wilson]

Hi Stefan,

> I also think there should be some kind of backwards compatibility, but 
> remembering this is the first "collaborative" release with the Windows 
> source merged in etc the backwards compatibility requirement could be 
> "waived" for this release I think. However, IMHO it should be a 
> requirement for future releases.

I can't see any good reason to break it for this release. Only new 
features have been added to the protocol. Until I fixed keepalives and 
enabled them in my config, the new clients were working fine with my 0.09 
server. Likewise, I can't see any reason that a 0.10 server shouldn't work 
with 0.09 clients in any configuration.

Cheers, Chris.
-- 
_ ___ __     _
  / __/ / ,__(_)_  | Chris Wilson <0000 at qwirx.com> - Cambs UK |
/ (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Perl/SQL/HTML Developer |
\ _/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU-free your mind-and your software |