[Box Backup] Release Candidate 3
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:38:18 +0000 (GMT)
> I also think there should be some kind of backwards compatibility, but
> remembering this is the first "collaborative" release with the Windows
> source merged in etc the backwards compatibility requirement could be
> "waived" for this release I think. However, IMHO it should be a
> requirement for future releases.
I can't see any good reason to break it for this release. Only new
features have been added to the protocol. Until I fixed keepalives and
enabled them in my config, the new clients were working fine with my 0.09
server. Likewise, I can't see any reason that a 0.10 server shouldn't work
with 0.09 clients in any configuration.
_ ___ __ _
/ __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson <0000 at qwirx.com> - Cambs UK |
/ (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Perl/SQL/HTML Developer |
\ _/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU-free your mind-and your software |