[Box Backup] restore file >2GB

[Matthias Rieber]

Hello Christ,

Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Matthias Rieber wrote:
> 
>>> OK, does anyone have a preference on whether I restore SINGLEPROCESS to
>>> its old meaning, and add a new option for _really_ only one process :-)
>>> or add a new option which just doesn't fork into the background, and
>>> otherwise behaves as normal?
>>
>> I think it's better to add a new option for that, because SINGLEPROCESS
>> is not the right name for that.
> 
> OK, following your and Martin's guidance I've added a new option, -F,
> which causes the daemon not to fork into the background, but still
> accept multiple connections.
> 
> Please could you update to the latest svn and check if this solves the
> problem for you? (using -F instead of SINGLEPROCESS)

I've tested chris_merge_1708. It seems to work as expected with daemontools.

Thanks!

matthias