[Box Backup] RFC: Migration of domain and hosting

Stuart Hickinbottom boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:13:41 +0100

I'm happy with subdomains, too. Presumably www.boxbackup.org and
boxbackup.org will be equivalent and also get you to the Trac site
without needing the explicit Trac subdomain to be specified?


James O'Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:05:45PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote:
>>  Sounds good to me, although it will reduce the lovely google rating I have 
>>  on fluffy.co.uk. :-(
> Righto, I'm getting there!
> Ben has put the website into svn, so this is now checked out on the new
> server and the website is running happily.
> www.boxbackup.org (and .com) should now be up and working (seems to be
> working from my end). This is currently the same as
> www.fluffy.co.uk/boxbackup but now it's in svn anyone can modify it.
> Some more decisions need to be made now (this is mainly for the
> developers):
> How do we want to work the svn and trac sites? I can either create
> subdomains (e.g. svn.boxbackup.org / trac.boxbackup.org) or keep it
> similar to the current setup (have /svn and /trac as aliases on the www
> site).
> My inclination is to go with the subdomain option, but am easy either
> way.
> I won't move the repository just yet so everything will be exactly the
> same for the time being.
> James
> _______________________________________________
> boxbackup mailing list
> boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup