[Box Backup] Configurable syslog facility
Chris Wilson
boxbackup@boxbackup.org
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:20:17 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Kenny Millington wrote:
>> I do wish maintainers would try to push stuff upstream instead of just
>> distributing their code with a random local patches and then forgetting
>> about them.
>
> Sorry, the way I originally phrased that might have been a tad unfair.
> As a first port of call I e-mailed the maintainer to suggest a use case
> for local6. His reply was to contact the box dev list to suggest it be
> user-configurable. (I was going to anyway, but thought I'd do things in
> the maintainer --> upstream order.)
Well, I accept the need for the option, but as I had no idea that
maintainers were distributing Box Backup with such a patch, it could have
caused considerable confusion while trying to help users to configure
syslog for logging, and also I had no idea that the configuration option
was needed until now.
> As far as Debian/Ubuntu goes LOG_DAEMON is "right" in the majority of
> cases, just not when using LogAllFileAccess to report on since it
> clutters the logs somewhat.
I'm not sure that I approve of the use of syslogs as an intermediate
storage for this kind of logging. It's already possible to log to a file
and specify a different verbosity level when doing so, so that debug level
logging doesn't end up in syslog, only in that file. I would have thought
that handling a backup-finish event, parsing and then deleting that file
would be more reliable.
> I take it this means it'll hit 0.12 - whenever that is? ;)
actually 0.11, whenever that is :)
Cheers, Chris.
--
_ ___ __ _
/ __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson <0000 at qwirx.com> - Cambs UK |
/ (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Perl/SQL/HTML Developer |
\ _/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU-free your mind-and your software |