[IWE] question for the USSC experts here

Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:51:56 -0700

--Boundary_(ID_6ux6B3b7igbMUSjyhylSgQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Had Caribou Barbie been asked this question=97or for that matter had she =
=20
been asked to discuss her favorite Federalist Paper=97it would properly =20=

have been seen as a ludicrous gotcha. But, young William Oxley, she =20
was asked "What newspapers and magazines do you read regularly," and =20
she was asked "What Supreme Court decisions do you disagree with?" To =20=

this she could have replied (for instance) "Oh, ya know, that one a =20
few years back where they said ya could lose your home if, ya know, if =20=

the city wanted it for a shoppin' mall or somethin," and few would =20
have been found to fault her for not saying "Kelo v. City of New =20
London." Oh, and box,

> Oy you, she did name a scotus decision she disagreed with at length. =20=

> Looking at some of the lot you have running over there being "thick =20=

> as shit" doesnt seem to be an impedimnet to running for office =20
> anywhere.

She was asked to name a SCOTUS decision other than Roe v. Wade, you =20
insufferable doofus. "Thick as shit" is just Peter being tactful.

On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:29 AM, williamoxley@aim.com wrote:

> what is the Schleswig-Holstein Question and how does the solution =20
> fit into to todays foreign policy decisions with regards to similar =20=

> issues?

--Boundary_(ID_6ux6B3b7igbMUSjyhylSgQ)
Content-type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; =
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Had Caribou Barbie been asked =
this question=97or for that matter had she been asked to discuss her =
favorite <i>Federalist Paper</i>=97it would properly have been seen as a =
ludicrous gotcha. But, young William Oxley, she was asked "What =
newspapers and magazines do you read regularly," and she was asked "What =
Supreme Court decisions do you disagree with?" To this she could have =
replied (for instance) "Oh, ya know, that one a few years back where =
they said ya could lose your home if, ya know, if the city wanted it for =
a shoppin' mall or somethin," and few would have been found to fault her =
for not saying "Kelo <i>v</i>. City of New London." Oh, and =
box,<div><br></div><div><blockquote type=3D"cite">Oy you, she did name a =
scotus decision she disagreed with at length. Looking at some of the lot =
you have running over there being "thick as shit" doesnt seem to be an =
impedimnet to running for office =
anywhere.</blockquote></div><div><br><div><div>She was asked to name a =
SCOTUS decision <i>other</i> than Roe <i>v</i>. Wade, you insufferable =
doofus. "Thick as shit" is just Peter being =
tactful.</div><div><br></div><div>On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:29 AM, <a =
href=3D"mailto:williamoxley@aim.com">williamoxley@aim.com</a> =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: =
separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; =
font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: =
auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: =
auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; ">what is the Schleswig-Holstein =
Question and how does the solution fit into to todays foreign policy =
decisions with regards to similar =
issues?</span></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>=

--Boundary_(ID_6ux6B3b7igbMUSjyhylSgQ)--