[Box Backup] 0.08PLUS1

[Nick Knight]

I was planning on spending some time on the win32 to see if there is a
bug - how certain are you with it may be still the server...

Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk [mailto:boxbackup-admin@fluffy.co.uk]
On Behalf Of Ben Summers
Sent: 17 November 2004 18:22
To: boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Box Backup] 0.08PLUS1


I'll track that down. Obviously something weird is going on with the=20
LFS support. Linux is nothing but "entertaining".

Ben


On 17 Nov 2004, at 17:13, Marco Bartholomew wrote:

> Also received the same error on Linux (2.4)
>
> WARNING: This test was run as root. Some tests have been omitted.
> PASSED
> --------
> common: PASSED
> crypto: PASSED
> compress: PASSED
> basicserver: PASSED
> raidfile: FAILED: Exception caught: RaidFile OSError
> backupstore: PASSED
> backupstorefix: PASSED
> backupstorepatch: PASSED
> backupdiff: PASSED
> bbackupd: PASSED
>
>
>
> Martin Ebourne wrote:
>> Ben Summers <ben@fluffy.co.uk> wrote:
>>> I've been sitting on these changes for too long.
>>>
>>> * Added test for Linux LFS support
>> Guessing at this being the culprit, but got some breakage from=20
>> 0.08PLUS1 on
>> FC3:
>> common: PASSED
>> crypto: PASSED
>> compress: PASSED
>> basicserver: PASSED
>> raidfile: FAILED: Exception caught: RaidFile OSError (Error when=20
>> accessing an
>> underlying file. Check file permissions allow files to be read and=20
>> written
>> in the configured raid directories.)
>> backupstore: PASSED
>> backupstorefix: PASSED
>> backupstorepatch: PASSED
>> backupdiff: PASSED
>> bbackupd: PASSED
>> Not had chance to investigate, sorry. Log attached.
>> Cheers,
>> Martin.
>
> _______________________________________________
> boxbackup mailing list
> boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
> http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup
>

_______________________________________________
boxbackup mailing list
boxbackup@fluffy.co.uk
http://lists.warhead.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/boxbackup